It’s been a busy week for architectural 3D
printing news with several good options to discuss but one breakthrough stands
above the others. I was quite happy to see the efforts of the Bartlett School
of Architecture, UK, reported by 3ders.org in regards to their cementitious 3D
printing achievements using a supported extrusion technique. This method begins with the placement of a cementitious material by a robotic head unit similar to that
which is used by other firms but differentiates itself by simultaneously laying
down a granular support material. After manufacturing once removed the process
leaves a distinctive pattern the designers call “Fossilized” and I call
“circuit board”. The process represents progress toward refining cementitious
3D printing technology by allowing for smaller detail tolerances. Unoforunately
factors such as the process’s structural strength and long-term performance are
still underreported and therefore a certain amount of skepticism is still
warranted before calling this technology useful architectural 3D printing. I
also question the qualifications of a group of designers to tackle what is
essentially a mechanical engineering problem. Absolutely their design aesthetic
is beyond reproach but where are they getting expertise in process, control,
chemical and mechanical engineering? Food for thought at this technology
continues to improve.
Agree? Disagree? Share your comments below.
Agree? Disagree? Share your comments below.
No comments:
Post a Comment