The development of modern building systems like HVAC and potable water had a major impact on the character of architectural design. Never before had the architect been asked to design sophisticated ventilation networks or heavy structural countermeasures. Increasingly complex public health and building safety were the pressures driving these changes and each was absent from the minds of Greco-Roman and Renaissance architects et al.
The need for interdisciplinary collaboration nor articles
calling for its implementation are anything new. The linked article makes a
strong point near the end of the piece arguing BIM establishes just such
functionality but first the bad: There is little effort on the part of the
author to analyze current obstacles to collaboration. In my experience
designers, consultants, and contractors on a project - each fundamentally
necessary to its completion - can be downright hostile to each other. Certainly
there is enough blame to go around for this situation, nor can this behavior be
assumed to be universal but in the meantime, it must be said, the article sheds
little light on why collaboration fails in AEC projects.
Where I do express agreement is that - at least
technologically – as building information modelling has matured collaboration
has improved. This has allowed different disciplines to offer and receive
accurate information earlier in the building design process leading to
fundamentally more valuable buildings.
Quoted in the article, Andrea Scotti, director of Burohappold
Engineering in Abu Dhabi, explains BIM's role in collaboration thusly: “In
terms of difficult projects to coordinate on, I would say that a few years ago
this would have been technical in nature, related to complex structures or
geometry. Nowadays, technology is there to help reduce these complexities.”
No comments:
Post a Comment